That's a huge advantage. I wanted an RF standard zoom lens but was priced out of the 24-105/2.8---it was more of the price than the weight. So I focused on the 24-105/4 or the 24-70/2.8. There were BF deals on both these lenses and I went with the faster lens. But the lack of 71-105mm is a compromise.
I was positively thrilled when Canon debuted their RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z zoom lens. It's the first model of any brand to feature a fixed f/2.8 aperture throughout the 24-105mm focal range. This versatile lens captures both expansive landscapes and stunning portraits, with vibrant colors and beautiful out-of-focus background elementsStill and video professionals who want a single lens that can handle most tasks with low-light capabilities will find what they’re looking for with the RF 24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z. This is the world’s first 24-105mm focal length lens combined with consistent f/2.8 maximum aperture, offering true portrait-length telephoto coverage resulting
AF noise on 24-105 Lens on SERVO mode. I've had the EOS R for less than a month and I've noticed this high-pitched, tinny metallic sound coming from the lens in AF Servo mode. It's quiet, but it's noticeable in a quiet room, so you may need to raise the volume a bit or use headphpones. It seems like the sound is from the lens constantly setting
Canon RF - Tested at 30mp (EOS R) Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 STM IS macro Canon RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 USM L Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 USM L IS Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 USM L IS Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 USM L IS Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 USM L IS Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 USM L IS Is RF 24-105 mm f/4 lens copy variation still a thing? Early Canon RF 100-300mm F2.8L IS USM lens review: Most bookmarked in this forum. 5: R5: 5: Personally I will buy only 2 RF lenses when I get the R5: - RF 24-105 f/4 for general purpose/landscape/travel photography. The 35mm advantage over the 24-70 is not negligible and at 105mm f/4 your DoF will be as shallow as 70mm f/2.8. - RF 70-200 f/2.8 for landscape, subject, mild wildlife and telemacro (0.2 magnification is enough for my use) The RF 24-105 and RF 24-240mm differ in reach, brightness, weather sealing and weight. I frequently carry multiple bodies and lenses so weight matters to me. I have had many Canon and Tamron 10X zooms before the RF and most of them had several significant issues to deal with at the extremes of aperture and focal length. Best Buy has honest and unbiased customer reviews for Canon - EOS R6 Mark II Mirrorless Camera with RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens - Black. Read helpful reviews from our customers. 3-Day Sale. This time, it's about the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 USM IS. Canon has a bit of a mixed history regarding super zoom lenses. There is, of course, the mighty EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 USM L IS or its predecessor, the EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6 USL L - both loved and well respected within the photojournalist community.Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS Review Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM Review Three Way Shootout Part 1: the LensesThe RF 24-105 has proven to be equal to, or superior to the EF version. The RF 24-105 compares favorably to the next commonly highly regarded 24-105 f/4, the Sony. In short of course the lens isn’t going to offer the IQ of fast primes. That’s a ridiculous comparison to even contemplate making.
So here are the kits I could do and fit in my camera bag, combining with the lenses I already own: Kit #1 (24-105 + 100-400mm): 1. RF 15-30mm f/4.5-6.3 (already own) 2. RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 ($249) 3. RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 ($599) Pros: Long reach (up to 400mm), higher quality on the telephoto shots. In situations where I might not need more than
Zyai. canon rf 24 105 lens review
